, , , ,


Dinosaur Provincial Park is a fossil site spanning the time approximately between 76,6-74,8 million years ago, in Alberta, Canada. It’s a famous site with well-known dinosaurs. There are ceratopsians such as Chasmosaurus and Styracosaurus, hadrosaurs such as Corythosaurus and ankylosaurs like Edmontonia. Most famously, the area was haunted by great tyrannosaurs Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus.

Less famously, the site also has a fairly good record of fossil plants. At the time, the area was a flat, forested plain with dozens of sediment-laden rivers slowly meandering towards the Western Interior Seaway. The climate was warm temperate, and plenty of ponds and swamps dotted the landscape. This gorgeous and accurate painting is by Julius Csotonyi, from this PLOS One paper, with Creative Commons license.

Let’s now take a closer look at the variety of plants that flourished in the area and fed the dinosaurs.

Finding information on floras of different fossil formations is often a higly frustrating task. Leaves and reproductive structures, fossilized wood and pollen or spore grains tend to be preserved separately. These are classified using no less that three separate taxonomic systems, none of which fully corresponds to the system used with living plants, and few of the plants have been properly decribed.

Metasequoia_glyptostroboides_-_Kunming_Botanical_Garden_-_DSC03287For example, in Dinosaur Provincial Park there are fossilized leaves classified as redwood (Sequoia), though it’s not quite clear if they actually belong to a close relative of modern redwoods or perhaps something related to dawn redwoods (Metasequoia). Fossil plants are often classified into modern genera like this. Sometimes these genera are used with quotation marks to say that they are not necessarily that closely related at all, which is more than a bit confusing. (photo: Metasequoia glyptostroboides in China, Publich Domain from Wikimedia Commons)

What is probably the fossilized wood of the same Dinosaur Provincial Park tree is called Taxodioxylon gypsaceum, and pollen grains probably belonging to the same thing are Sequoiapollenites paleocenicus. What a nightmare.

Let’s try to make some sense of this, however bad it may seem. The pollen record (technically known as the palynological record) is, predictably, the most complete. More than 500 different species of pollen and spores are known from Dinosaur Provincial Park, but these can usually only be classified down to family level. What we do know is that the site had a rich and lush Cretaceous vegetation. There are dozens of ferns of multiple groups, including no less than 20 species of Schizaceae or climbing ferns and 6 species of Gleicheniales, untypical ferns that were featured in the first part of this series. There are plenty of conifers, but only a few cycads, which are dominant in drier areas. There’s also half a dozen relatives of Ephedra, the shrubby gymnosperm that looks a bit like a tussock of grass and sometimes produces red false-fruit.

14468559608_8605b6e63d_kAs we are living in the Late Cretaceous, flowering plants were already diverse and abundant. The wet conditions might have still given ferns some edge, but angiosperms sure were there. There were relatives of modern birches, maples, elms and willows, lilies, sundews and proteas. There were no true grasses yet, but two closely related groups are represented: sedges and bur-reeds (photo: lesser bur-reed and a dragonfly exuviae, Tom Potterfield/Flickr).

A more complete list of plant groups known from the palynological record and the species diversity of each can be found in the end of this article.

Fossilized wood, on the other hand, gives us a valuable hint of the structure of Dinosaur Provincial Park forests. All fossil wood chunks known from the site belong to gymnosperms. It seems conifers and ginkgoes still formed the top layer of tall trees, or most of it at least. Flowering plants, though many of them belonging to families that today include big trees, were still pushed to the undergrowth layers as herbs and shrubs, perhaps small trees.

Fortunately, pollen and pieces of wood are not the only things we need to rely on. There is also a record of plant macrofossils, which means leaves, flowers and other reproductive structures, twigs and roots, some quite well preserved. Unfortunately, none of them seem to have been formally described, and the names given to them are no less than five decades old. A few of them have apparently been illustrated in Bell’s 1965 paper that I could not reach despite my efforts (I’d gladly hear if I’m wrong and have just missed some particularly obscure paper, though). Thankfully, Late Cretaceous fossil plants classified into the same species or genera from other parts of North America have been illustrated elsewhere. I used these, and the verbal descriptions in Currie & Koppelhus (2005) to reconstruct some of the plants of Dinosaur Provincial Park.

According to Bell’s species list reproduced in Currie & Koppelhus’s book, there are multiple gymnosperm trees known from leaf and twig fossils, as would be expected, dominant trees as they were. Baiera digitata is a ginkgo tree with deeply divided leaves that lack a clear petiole – the slender stalk separating leaf from branch. Ginkgoites sp., a ginkgo with clear petioles and broader leaf lobes, is also present, though some researchers prefer to sink both into different species of Ginkgo. Apparently, fossil ginkgo nomenclature is a mess. Conifers are represented by Elatocladus albertaensis, a conifer variably described either as a podocarp or a yew tree, and sequoias (Sequoia or Metasequoia). There arehorsetail fronds, and a variety of ferns.

vitis stantoni

The most common flowering plant macrofossil of the site is a vine called “Vitisstantoni, either with or without the quotation marks. Vitis is the same genus in which today’s grapevine (Vitis vinifera), the commercially grown grape, is classified, which hints that the species are more than a bit similar, though nobody has apparently looked into this in detail. V. stantoni had variable, alternately placed leaves with serrated edges; they can be simple or compound. The species is widely distributed in many fossil-bearing formations of Late Cretaceous North America. If it actually was a grapevine, it would probably also produce edible fruit, but I have not been able to find a mention if they are preserved in the fossil record or not.

dinosaur provincial park flora2

Other flowering plant macrofossils include Platanus affinis and P. latiloba, relatives of modern sycamore trees; Cercidiphyllum sp., a katsura tree; Artocarpus sp., a breadfruit tree; Menispermites sp., a climbing plant probably related to moonseed (Menispermum), descibed as having palmately lobed leaves with heart-shaped bases; and roots and tubers that have assigned as gingers (Zingiberaceae).

trapago angulata

There might have been separate plant communities along riverbanks, with a different set of species further in the forest. As Dinosaur park had slow, meandering rivers and plenty of standing water, aquatic plants were abundant. There’s even a couple of aquatic angiosperms: Pistia corrugatus, a floating member of the arum family (Araceae) and what has been called Trapa sp., a water chestnut, in older papers. A relatively recent paper that actually illustrates and properly describes this plant from the slightly younger St. Mary River formation of Alberta, names it Trapago angulata. While it has a growth habit very much like modern water chestnut, there is little evidence that they truly are close relatives, and it is not known whether Trapago also produced big, edible “nuts”. If it did, they would have been a tasty treat for small herbivorous dinosaurs that could crack the hard, spiny fruit.

Dinosaur Provincial Park had interesting seasons not similar to anything found on Earth today. Climate was warm temperate with the sea nearby, perhaps something like that of modern France or southernmost Britain, with seasonally fluctuating temperatures but rare or no frosts.


While there wasn’t a snowy winter, it certainly doesn’t mean seasons weren’t clear. There seem to have been rainy and dry seasons with the forest flooding annually. That’s what happens in much of modern flat plains regardless of their location – or at least would happen, had not many the rivers been dammed long ago to prevent flooding of arable land. (photo: flooded coniferous forest in Deception Falls Park, WA, USA, pfly/Flickr)

At the time, Alberta was located between 60° and 65° Northern Latitude, which fairly precisely matches with southern half of Finland, where I currently live. While there was no midnight sun in summers, Dinosaur Park summer nights weren’t long and dark either, but a short soft dwilight. In the winter, daylight only lasted for a few hours. It must have been depressingly wet, muddy, chilly and dark, much like a very long Finnish autumn. Many broadleaved trees and perhaps some of the conifers too would have shed their leaves, as photosynthesis probably wasn’t worthwhile during the short, cool days.

First part: Not all Ferns Look Like Ferns.

Second part: Fruit for the Dinosaurs.

Third part: On Grasses and not Exactly Grasses.

Appendix: A list of microfossil plants of Dinosaur Provincial Park

Here’s a shortened list of what has been found in the palynological record (pollen and spores, that is), from Currie & Koppelhus 2005. All of these should be regaded as the minimum number of species present, as there are many unclassified species, and not all have been yet found and named, obviously. So, brace yourselves. The plants are coming:

  • 35 species of fungi (not plants, but there would undoubtedly have been mushrooms and lichens in the forest).
  • 24 species of mosses, including relatives of Sphagnum mosses, today associated with wet peatlands.
  • 11 species of club mosses (relatives of modern Lycopodium) and 6 species of spikemosses (Selaginella being the only living genus)
  • 44 species of ferns, including highly atypical groups such as climbing ferns (Schizaceae), aquatic Marsileaceae, and Matoniaceae. A few species of the youngest radiation including most living ferns, Polypodiales, are also known.
  • 3 species of cycads
  • 13 species of conifers, including 4 pines, 3 cypresses, 4 podocarps and 2 cheirolepids.
  • 6 species of mormon teas (Ephedraceae, relatives of modern Ephedra)
  • 32 unidentified fern allies and 3 unidentified gymnosperms.

Flowering plants:

  • 1 species of boxwood (Buxaceae) an evergreen shrub.
  • 1 species of gunnera (Gunneraceae), herbaceous plants with sometimes enormous leaves.
  • 1 species of the willow family (Salicaceae) including modern willows, poplar, and aspen.
  • 1 species of sundew (Droseraceae), a swamp-dwelling carnivorous plant.
  • 2 species of Olacaceae, a diverse tropical group of shrubs, trees, and vines.
  • 1 species of Loranthaceae, a group mostly consisting of parasitic mistletoes.
  • 1 species of soapberry (Sapindaceae), a disturbingly diverse family with thousands of species of mostly shrubs and trees.
  • 1 species of maple (Aceraceae).
  • 9 species of proteas (Proteaeceae), diverse plants with showy flowers today restricted to Australia and southern Africa. They prefer drier areas today, and might have either been different back then or grown in dry microhabitats.
  • 1 species of the sunflower family (Compositae), characterised by their mostly colourful compound flowers and an astonishing diversity of species (that is, some 25 000 species on all continents except Antarctica).
  • 2 species of Fagaceae, the family including beech, chestnut, and oak trees.
  • 1 species of Betulaceae, birches and alders.
  • 1 species of elm (Ulmaceae).
  • 1 species of goosefoot (Chenpodiaceae).
  • 6 species of lilies (Liliaceae).
  • 1 species of sedge (Cyperaceae).
  • 1 species of bur-reed (Sparganiaceae) a wetland plant closely related to grasses.
  • 88 species of unidentified flowering plants.

References and further reading:

Philip J. Currie & Eva B. Kuppelhus (2005) Dinosaur Provincial Park: a Spectacular Ancient Ecosystem Revealed. Indiana University Press.

Wikipedia: Dinosaur Park Formation. Includes plant lists identical to Currie & Kuppelhus’s book and lists of animals known from the site.

University of Texas: Palynology. A short introduction into the science of fossil pollen and spores.

Bell 1949: Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene floras of Western Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 13.

Bell 1965: Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene plants of Western Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 65-35. (which I could not reach)

Stockey & Rothwell 1997: The aquatic angiosperm Trapago angulata from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichian) St. Mary River Formation of Southern Alberta. International Journal of Plant Sciences.

Smithsonian Museum of Natural History: Big Cedar Ridge, Wyoming: a 73 million-year-old preserved landscape. Reconstructions and photographs of fossil plants from Cedar Ridge, Wyoming: a site few hundred kilometers south and a few million years backwards in time from Dinosaur Provincial Park.

Royer et al. 2003: Ecological conservatism in the “living fossil” Ginkgo. Paleobiology.

University of California Museum of Paleontology: Fossil record of the Ginkgoales.

Mallon & Anderson 2013: Skull Ecomorphology of Megaherbivorous Dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLOS One. Open-access paper on the browsing habits of Dinosaur Park herbivores.