Tags
I was recently (and rather persistently) informed that paleoartists might find this sort of articles useful: easily approachable pieces about botany as relevant to paleoart. Most paleoartists are, understandably, primarily interested in prehistoric animals. Unfortunately animals don’t often live on lifeless deserts, so depicting vegetation tends to be essential part of the trade.
Full reconstructions of prehistoric plants or even photographs of plant fossils are often frustratingly hard to find, resulting in quite stereotypical vegetation in much of paleoart. Some ginkgoes, some monkey puzzle trees, cycads that almost always tend to look like Cycas revoluta. And, of course, ferns.
But not all ferns have the nondescript green, bipinnate leaves like the ones we all think of when hearing the word ‘fern’. Paleoartists have a lot more choice than that, even when looking just at the modern diversity. Before the onslaught of hyper-diverse, overly competitive flowering plants and drying climates, ferns were probably vastly more diverse than now. Today’s ferns are pushed into marginal habitats, mostly damp and dark places like forest undergrowth layers (photo: Platycerium elephantotis in Uganda, Bernard Dupont/Flickr).
Still, ferns show a remarkable diversity of leaf shapes. These examples are from my own small collection.
Aquatic ferns, such as Ceratopteris, tend to have very thin, almost see-through leaves. If they happen to be amphibious, the leaves show a different morphology under and above the surface. This particular one grows a lot broader, but smaller leaves underwater. Dimorphic ferns would add a nice touch to aquatic paleoart scenes.
Species living in somewhat drier or sunnier environments, such as Cyrtomium falcatum, often have thick, shiny leaves to minimize water loss. Adiantums, on the other hand, often grow in very damp places, such as on the edges of streams and waterfalls. Their matte leaves efficiently repel water.
Epiphytic ferns have their own special looks. They have the shiny leaves of a plant that has to tolerate occasional droughts. Their leaves are often less pinnate than those of forest floor ferns. They have creeping, hairy rhizomes that take a firm grip of the host tree, sometimes almost looking like a strangler fig. On the right, a hare’s foot fern (Dawallia sp.) grows on a Wrightia tree.
Though no modern creeping fern attains anything near the size of a strangler fig, it wouldn’t be at all impossible if some prehistoric species did. A huge, hairy fern hugging a ginkgo tree to death. Why not?
The world before flowers was not all greens and browns, either. The young leaves of many plants, especially those growing on low latitutes, are more or less reddish, sometimes quite showy. On the left side is a Pteris growing under bright artificial light, on the right an unidentified fern in Sinharaja rainforest, Sri Lanka.
Red pigments are probably there to protect the young leaf from too much radiation, much like our own skin pigments. There’s also a downside to this: animals with a good enough colour vision can use them as a clue to find the tasty, soft young leaves. This is probably what fern-eating dinosaurs did too, at least the small browsing ones that could selectively pick the best parts. It has even been suggested that being able to find young leaves was the original selective pressure behind the trichromatic vision of Old World monkeys, including us of course.
Variegated plants are often considered merely a horticultural oddity, a consequence of gardeners preferring mutant individuals. Many wild plants, however, also have white, silvery, red or purple bloches or veins. Not even ferns are immune.
Variegation or whole non-green leaves are often associated with plants growing in bright light. It seems to offer protection from the sun, much like the red coloration of young leaves. Red or purple is caused by pigments such as anthocyanins that absorb UV radiation. Whitish and silvery are structural colours, caused by either tiny trichomes on the leaf or microscopic layers inside it. They reflect the sun’s rays, perhaps protecting the plant from overheating in addition to UV damage. Many variegated plants become more colourful when grown in bright light. On the right, the newest leaves of my Pteris ensiformis growing in very bright conditions are more silvery-white than green.
There could be other uses for colours as well. They could be warning signals to animals. There is some evidence that both bright autumn colours of temperate zone trees and variegated leaves of tropical plants are associated with less insect damage. Coloration could be a fitness signal like the high jumps of a gazelle in danger, or an aposematic signal like that of a wasp. You don’t have to have a brain to be able to communicate.
Creative Commons photos, from left to right: Salvinia molesta in Hawaii, Marshman/Wikipedia. Azolla filiculoides in Germany, Christian Fischer/Wikimedia Commons. Marsilea villosa, Forest & Kim Starr/Wikipedia. Pilularia globulifera in Germany, Christian Fischer/Wikimedia Commons.
A whole radiation of very unfernlike aquatic ferns also exists – the Salviniales. Their four main lineages are pictured above. They are a fairly old lineage, with members classified into modern genera dating from the Cretaceous, which makes them a fairly safe bet for at least late Mesozoic scenes. There’s also a fossil species, Hydropteris pinnata, from the Late Cretaceous of Canada that looks much like a cross between Pilularia and a moonwort.
The ferns seen above are all members of Polypodiales, the most recent radiation of ferns. They are by no means living fossils, but seem to have arosen only about 100 million or so years ago. For a paleoartist reconstructing scenes older than the Cretaceous, they act mostly as ecological help. Convergent evolution within plants is rampant, and older ferns growing in similar habitats may have looked very similar to modern species.
However, there are still ancient fern lineages alive, and not all of them actually look like ferns either. They are limited in terms of diversity, seemingly remnants that just haven’t yet gotten around to go extinct yet.
The Marattiales is a truly ancient group of tree ferns, though depending on the classification, they might be more closely related to horsetails than actual ferns. The well-known Carboniferous tree fern Psaronius is actually classified into this group, as well as numerous other genera through the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras.
Amazingly, multiple genera of Marattiales still exist in southern hemisphere. They are large plants with fleshy (and sometimes edible) rootstocks and gigantic fronds. While species of Marattia and Angiopteris look otherwise much like ordinary ferns, Christensenia is completely different and somewhat resembles a horse chestnut (pictured: Angiopteris evecta, Forest & Kim Starr/Wikimedia Commons).
Creative Commons photos, from left to right: Matonia pectinata in Malaysia, Shipher Wu/Flickr. Gleichenia alpina in Tasmania, Nuytsia/Flickr. Dipteris conjugata in Malaysia, Thomas Brown/Flickr.
The Gleicheniales (examples above) appear on the fossil record in the Triassic and were common throughout the Mesozoic. They contain some true oddities, at least compared to our typical view on ferns. Leaves very much like these are known from the fossil record, for example from multiple locations around the Jurassic of Europe.
Creative Commons photos, from left to right: Lygodium japonicum, Shipher Wu/Flickr. Lygodium palmatum, Dogtooth77/Flickr. L. palmatum fertile fronds, Kerry Wixted/Flickr.
Just to top it all of, these are climbing ferns of the genus Lygodium. They differ from all other ferns in that their fronds grow endlessly and twine around other plants like a true vine, the main difference being that a whole Lygodium vine is technically a single leaf. Fern vines and lianas aren’t far fetched in Mesozoic paleoart either. Schizaeales, the group containing Lygodium, was most widespread on the northern hemisphere in the Mesozoic, though today it’s mostly found from the southern continents.
Lygodium forms huge masses growing on top of other plants, much like more familiar creeping plants do. In Florida, L. microphyllum and L. japonicum are invasive plants. Pictured is L. microphyllum growing on cypresses in modern Florida, a scene probably not too much different from those a time traveler might see in the Mesozoic (photo: Homer Edward Price/Flickr).
While this still was a rather shallow dive to the diversity of ferns (though it’s a lot longer than anything I intended to write!), I hope it did something to help mapping the possibilities of ferns in paleoart. If you were inspired by this article, feel free leave a comment, and perhaps a link to your work.
References and further photographs:
UCLA College Life Sciences: Leaf Color.
Lev-Yadun & Gould 2007: What do red and yellow autumn leaves signal? The Botanical Review.
Dominy & Lucas 2001: Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature.
What are ferns? A brief and approachable look at modern fern biology.
University of California Museum of Paleontology: Pteridopsida. A brief overview of fern paleontology, including the temporal ranges of different groups.
Wikipedia: Leptosporangiate fern. Includes a phyogeny and a wealth of information about fern diversity.
Fabulous Ferns. A gallery of tropical ferns.
Craven Sean said:
Gosh, you’re swell. Thank you very much for this — I stopped doing paleo-art a while ago, and frustration with plant and landscape references had a lot to do with it.
Tom Parker said:
Excellent article.
Duane said:
Nice article and good points. I used to blog a lot about Mesozoic plants and need to get back to them (antediluvian salad). One of my big question regarding ferns in the Mesozoic is that many of the formations are described as semi-arid but still hosted a multitude of ferns that most closely resemble more mesic modern ferns. I have yet to see good fossil evidence of xeric ferns from the Mesozoic – I am sure they had to have existed. The Morrison formation for example was supposed to have been semi-arid but still hosted a high diversity of ferns. It could be that the largely monsoonal climate regime made things just wet enough for them to complete their water mediated reproductive life cycle. By the way some good books are Plants in Mesozoic Time and Paleobotany ed by Taylor latest edition.
Maija Karala said:
Thanks for your comment! I’m a big fan of Antediluvian Salad.
Aridity of Mesozoic formations is admittedly a bit of mystery. How about the palynological record, any chance of differentiating between mesic and xeric ferns there?
Though environments are not uniform. Could it be possible that while the landscape was being dominated by dry-adapted plants, damp crevices, riverbanks, valleys and such microhabitats were filled with ferns? I’m thinking about modern Mediterranean, which is pretty arid, but still has a diversity of ferns.
Thanks for the book recommendations. It’s a bit difficult to find good books without the possibility of leafing through them in bookstores.
Duane said:
I don’t know if xerix ferns have different spore than more mesic ones… I have read on occasion that spore count in the Mesozoic is used as a proxy for temperature. It increases towards the poles and is low at the equator where an arid band seems to have dominated most of the Mesozoic. Cycads and cheirolopediacea seem to have dominated truly dry habitats.
Serena said:
I love ferns, they are fascinating plants!!! I have quite a weird one right in front of me, at home.
gaiainaction said:
Just now I was walking through a short lane where at least 5 or 6 different Ferns grow, they are so beautiful, I was thinking of going out again and photographing them to have a record. Thanks for a very informative write up.
gaiainaction said:
Wow.
Mike Keesey (@tmkeesey) said:
Great post!
I’m curious — what is thought to be the ancestral morphology for ferns?
Maija Karala said:
Thanks!
It seems the very earliest ferns – such as the Carboniferous Psaronius – basically look like, well, ferns. The stereotypical fern with pinnate or bipinnate leaves and perhaps a bit of trunk seems to have been a basic model, which has then been modified into various forms.
In that regard, stereotypical ferns are probably a fairly safe bet for any time period, at least when illustrating humid environments (if one has to draw random plants instead of specific ones known from the formation, of course). They just get a bit boring, and don’t really take into account the diversity of either ferns or plants overall.
Mike Keesey (@tmkeesey) said:
Oh good, I don’t have to change my current pick, then: http://phylopic.org/name/78cd8e68-117c-47a8-a44a-25da24b4c099
Maija Karala said:
Just had to add – the interesting thing is that the ancestral morphology of pretty much everything is ‘stereotypical fern’, at least when it comes to leaf shape. Basal seed plants (Archaeopteridales) and their early offshoots (‘seed ferns’), many bennettitales and cycads all have pinnate or bipinnate leaves that look fern-like at a quick glance.
Mike Keesey (@tmkeesey) said:
Had sort of noticed that, but wasn’t sure if it was plesiomorphic or homoplastic. Thanks!
Pingback: Fruit for the Dinosaurs (botany for paleoartists part II) | Humming Dinosaurs and Nature's Other Small Wonders
ezequielvera said:
Very nice post!!! You could also add Cyathealean tree ferns to replace all these palms in Jurassic depictions 🙂
Maija Karala said:
Thanks!
And yep, no Jurassic palm trees. There are plenty of sorts of tree ferns and large cycads to choose from.
Pingback: On Grasses and Not Exactly Grasses (botany for paleoartists part III) | Humming Dinosaurs and Nature's Other Small Wonders
Pingback: Flora in the Time of Chasmosaurs (botany for paleoartists, part IV) | Humming Dinosaurs and Nature's Other Small Wonders
Pingback: Old Trees are Old Friends (botany for paleoartists part VI) | Humming Dinosaurs and Nature's Other Small Wonders
April Rasmussen said:
Oh this was lovely! Really great information. I have a lot of these at home! I don’t know if you’ve solved this yet (and it’s probably irrelevant given this is an old post), but in the second photo, the unidentified fern in the middle is almost definitely asplenium antiquum ‘crissie’. They are beautiful bird’s nest ferns. The third fern in the third picture is most likely phymatosorus scolopendria, though you’d need to check the rhizomes to be certain. We have them here in Australia creeping over damp rock-faces. So cool.
Pingback: Palaeobotany for Paleoartists: Fossil Cycads – Mario Coiro
Riley said:
Great artilcle. Most of your pics are of familiar and native species to where i live qnd are often seen growing in the rainforest, people’s gardens or even on unwashed cars(stag horns will set spore down onto the thinest). I’m going to add my thoughts to aridity and fern diversity in Mesozoic habitats: perhaps they are seasonal. Plants like Nardoo(an aquatuc fern marsilea drummondii) will survive for years in the ground as dormant tubers and spores and will germinate. When i was at univerity in Townsville(which seems to fit the bill for a semi arid, seasonal enviroment, the area is also essentially a floodplain, so some strong paralells to some of the environs we hear about from rhe mesozoic) after storms you’d have standing puddles everwhere and before long there would be these four leaf clover shaped ferns growing everywhere.
So onto non-aquatic ferns, i put forwards the idea that the fern cover of (say the Morrison)’s fern praries might have only lasted the wet season and a few months after(or until rhe first fires) and then retreated underground to survive the dry(and any fires). This boom and bust lifestyle might explain the diverity of ferns in what is considered a semi arid environ. I’d like to add that season, in paleo-art should really be given attention: In Australia where some places really have that distinct 2 seasons you can have what looks like a a barren dust bowl or a place so teaming with life, vegitation and vibrancy that its hard to comprehend the difference is 1 or 2 storms and a handful of days growth.